LBlock: A Lightweight Block Cipher

A related key impossible differential attack against 22 rounds of the lightweight block cipher LBlock

Differential Cryptanalysis and Boomerang Cryptanalysis of LBlock

LBlock is a lightweight block cipher proposed in ACNS 2011. It has 64-bit block size and 80-bit key size which is the typical parameter setting accpeted by most of the recent proposed lightweight block ciphers. It has fast hardware implementation efficiency and it still remains rather secure considering the recent results and the security margin it provides. In this paper, we investigate the di...

Biclique Cryptanalysis of Block Ciphers LBlock and TWINE-80 with Practical Data Complexity

In the biclique attack, a shorter biclique usually results in less data complexity, but at the expense of more computational complexity. The early abort technique can be used in partial matching part of the biclique attack in order to slightly reduce the computations. In this paper, we make use of this technique, but instead of slight improvement in the computational complexity, we keep the amo...

Round Addition Differential Fault Analysis on Lightweight Block Ciphers with On-the-Fly Key Scheduling

Round addition differential fault analysis using operation skipping for lightweight block ciphers with on-the-fly key scheduling is presented. For 64-bit KLEIN, it is shown that only a pair of correct and faulty ciphertexts can be used to derive the secret master key. For PRESENT, one correct ciphertext and two faulty ciphertexts are required to reconstruct the secret key. Furthermore, secret k...

Improved differential fault analysis on lightweight block cipher LBlock for wireless sensor networks

LBlock is a 64-bit lightweight block cipher which can be implemented in both constrained hardware environments, such as wireless sensor network, and software platforms. In this paper, we study the security of LBlock against a differential fault analysis. Based on a random nibble fault model, we propose two versions of the attack on LBlock. In the first attack, we inject random nibble faults to ...